Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Core i3-2367M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 4113 days newer than Core i3-2367M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2367M
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 82% better in Starfield than Core i3-2367M - 73 vs 40 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2367M - 16 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$1,617.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65337 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Oct 1st, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2367M | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
1.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
17 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |