Key Differences
In short — FX-8150 outperforms Core i3-2350M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8150 is 11 days newer than Core i3-2350M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2350M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Performs up to 1% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i3-2350M - 107 vs 106 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2350M - 8 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
107
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.81/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.12
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$87.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Oct 1st, 2011
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2350M | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Oct 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |