Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms Core i3-2328M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 2190 days newer than Core i3-2328M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2328M
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Performs up to 17% better in Battlefield V than Core i3-2328M - 237 vs 202 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2328M - 32 vs 4 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
FPS
237
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.98/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1180.39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$1,180.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18273 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2328M | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |