Key Differences
In short — FX-9370 outperforms Core i3-2120T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-9370 is 646 days newer than Core i3-2120T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2120T
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD FX-9370 - 35 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-9370
- Performs up to 1% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i3-2120T - 168 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2120T - 8 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i3-2120T
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FX-9370
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2120T | vs | AMD FX-9370 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
| Core i3 | Collection | FX |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 220 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
