Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms Core i3-2100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 2144 days newer than Core i3-2100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2100
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 8% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-2100 - 256 vs 237 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i3-2100 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i3-2100
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-2100
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Single-Core
466
76.64473684210526%
Multi-Core
954
91.46692233940557%
Intel Core i3-2100 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 20th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
