Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Core i9-9900KS on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 820 days newer than Core i9-9900KS.
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 10% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-9900KS - 664 vs 606 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KS - 58 vs 127 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-9900KS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
664
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.16/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$109
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$109 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 162 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-12100F | vs | Core i9-9900KS |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 28th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
58 W | TDP | 127 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |