Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-12100 outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-12100 is 3737 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100
- Performs up to 433% better in League of Legends than FX-6100 - 261 vs 49 FPS
- Up to 59% better value when playing League of Legends than FX-6100 - CA$0.68 vs CA$1.65 per FPS
- Consumes up to 37% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 60 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i3-12100 - CA$80.8 vs CA$176.36
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
261
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.68/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$176.36
45%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$176.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10644 minutes ago
Buy for CA$80.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10635 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-12100 | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Alder Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
60 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |