Key Differences
In short — Core i3-1125G4 outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-1125G4 is 883 days newer than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-1125G4
- Performs up to 16% better in World of Warcraft than Celeron G4900 - 184 vs 159 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 28 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
159
86%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$49.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Sep 2nd, 2020
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-1125G4 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Tiger Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel BGA 1449 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
28 W | TDP | 54 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Iris Xe Graphics G4 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |