Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2388G outperforms Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2388G is 496 days newer than Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2388G - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2388G
- Performs up to 11% better in Battlefield V than Core i3-10320 - 269 vs 243 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 16 vs 8 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Xeon E-2388G
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1539
66.97127937336815%
Multi-Core
4626
46.29240468327829%
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Xeon E-2388G |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2021 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P750 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
