Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10320 is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 8% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-7400T - 178 vs 165 FPS
- Up to 5% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-7400T - CA$1.45 vs CA$1.52 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Up to 3% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - CA$250.0 vs CA$257.31
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
178
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.45/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$257.31
97%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$257.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16163 minutes ago
Buy for CA$250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16164 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i5-7400T |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |