Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 758 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 8% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Celeron G4900 - 169 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - CA$49.99 vs CA$257.31
- Up to 79% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-10320 - CA$0.32 vs CA$1.52 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 54 vs 65 Watts
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
169
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.52/FPS
21%
Price, CA$
CA$257.31
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$257.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16333 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
156
92%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$49.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16333 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |