Buy on Amazon
CA$259.45
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 1703 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 11% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Celeron G3900 - 253 vs 227 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - CA$42.99 vs CA$259.45
- Up to 82% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i3-10320 - CA$0.19 vs CA$1.03 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 51 vs 65 Watts
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
253
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.03/FPS
18%
Price, CA$
CA$259.45
16%
FPS Winner
Intel® Core™ i3-10320 Desktop Processor 4 Cores up to 4.6 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W, Model Number: BX8070110320
Buy for CA$259.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 127 minutes ago
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
227
89%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$42.99
100%
Value Winner
INTEL - CELERON Processor G3900 2M 2.80
Buy for CA$42.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 127 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
