Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10320 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10320 is 576 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 19% better in Immortals of Aveum than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 56 vs 47 FPS
- Up to 86% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - CA$257.31 vs CA$1881.0
- Up to 89% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - CA$4.59 vs CA$40.02 per FPS
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 65 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 48 vs 8 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
56
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.59/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$257.31
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$257.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12213 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
FPS
47
83%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$40.02/FPS
11%
Price, CA$
CA$1881
13%
Buy for CA$1,881 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12214 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 2nd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 48 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 250 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |