Buy on Amazon
CA$274.32
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $122
Availability
MSRP in USD: $122
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 2746 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 45% better in War Thunder than FX-4300 - 188 vs 130 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - CA$36.09 vs CA$274.32
- Up to 81% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i3-10320 - CA$0.28 vs CA$1.46 per FPS
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
188
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.46/FPS
19%
Price, CA$
CA$274.32
13%
FPS Winner
Intel® Core™ i3-10320 Desktop Processor 4 Cores up to 4.6 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W, Model Number: BX8070110320
Buy for CA$274.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
FX-4300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
130
69%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.09
100%
Value Winner
AMD FX-Series FX-4300 CPU Used 4-Core 4-Thread Desktop Processor 3.8 GHz 4M 95W Socket AM3+
Buy for CA$36.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FX-4300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Core i3 | Collection | FX |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
