Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3950X is 157 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Up to 86% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3950X - CA$144.99 vs CA$1022.57
- Up to 86% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 9 3950X - CA$1.08 vs CA$7.52 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3950X - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
- Performs up to 1% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-10300 - 136 vs 134 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10300 - 32 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
134
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.08/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$144.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$144.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 182 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
136
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$7.52/FPS
14%
Price, CA$
CA$1022.57
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,022.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 183 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |