Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 659 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - CA$159.99 vs CA$474.95
- Up to 57% better value when playing Rust than Core i9-13900F - CA$0.8 vs CA$1.85 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 29% better in Rust than Core i3-10105 - 257 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105 - 32 vs 8 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
199
77%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.8/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$159.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$159.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
257
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.85/FPS
43%
Price, CA$
CA$474.95
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$474.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |