Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 659 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - CA$159.99 vs CA$479.97
- Up to 58% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-13700F - CA$0.28 vs CA$0.66 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 27% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-10105 - 723 vs 568 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105 - 24 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
568
78%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$159.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$159.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 219 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
723
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.66/FPS
42%
Price, CA$
CA$479.97
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$479.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 219 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |