Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 245 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10105.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Up to 91% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - CA$159.99 vs CA$1700.0
- Up to 90% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - CA$1.23 vs CA$12.69 per FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 3% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i3-10105 - 134 vs 130 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105 - 32 vs 8 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
130
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.23/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$159.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$159.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
134
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$12.69/FPS
9%
Price, CA$
CA$1700
9%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,700 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |