Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 477 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10105.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Up to 92% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - CA$151.99 vs CA$2000.0
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 65 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield IV than Core i3-10105 - 426 vs 418 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105 - 64 vs 8 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$151.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76714 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
426
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$2000
7%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$2,000 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76715 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Single-Core
1487
90.89242053789731%
Multi-Core
4609
32.90262707024557%
Intel Core i3-10105 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 32 |
8 | Threads | 64 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |