Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 1348 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - CA$142.46 vs CA$853.13
- Up to 78% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i9-14900F - CA$0.78 vs CA$3.6 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 30% better in World of Warcraft than Core i3-10100 - 237 vs 183 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10100 - 32 vs 8 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
183
77%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.78/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$142.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$142.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
237
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.6/FPS
21%
Price, CA$
CA$853.13
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$853.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10100 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |