Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - CA$144.98 vs CA$304.99
- Up to 48% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i5-11600K - CA$0.58 vs CA$1.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 10% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i3-10100 - 273 vs 249 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10100 - 12 vs 8 threads
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
249
91%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.58/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$144.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$144.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
273
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.12/FPS
51%
Price, CA$
CA$304.99
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$304.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10100 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |