Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10100 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10100 is 994 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 11% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 367 vs 332 FPS
- Up to 90% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - CA$139.59 vs CA$1393.07
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 95 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10100 - 32 vs 8 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for CA$139.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76653 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
332
90.46321525885558%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$1393.07
10%
Buy for CA$1,393.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76654 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
82.11781206171108%
Multi-Core
7539
100%
Intel Core i3-10100 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |