Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10100 outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10100 is 3123 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 17% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-4100 - 175 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i3-10100 - CA$31.73 vs CA$144.01
- Up to 74% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-10100 - CA$0.21 vs CA$0.82 per FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
175
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.82/FPS
25.609756097560975%
Price, CA$
CA$144.01
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$144.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
150
85.71428571428571%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.21/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$31.73
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$31.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10100 | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |