Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 2890 days newer than Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 21% better in Valorant than Celeron G550 - 817 vs 678 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 20 vs 2 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for CA$516.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76545 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
385
21.837776517300057%
Multi-Core
629
6.871313087175006%
Intel Celeron G550 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |