Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 3210 days newer than Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 7% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Celeron G550 - 159 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 8 vs 2 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for CA$84.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76027 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
385
26.478679504814306%
Multi-Core
629
14.065295169946332%
Intel Celeron G550 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |