Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 1854 days newer than Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 7% better in Far Cry 5 than Celeron G550 - 195 vs 182 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 64 vs 2 threads
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G550
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G550 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | EPYC |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Naples |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 32 |
| 2 | Threads | 64 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
