Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 182 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 97% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - CA$49.99 vs CA$1881.0
- Up to 97% better value when playing Horizon Zero Dawn than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - CA$0.32 vs CA$11.0 per FPS
- Consumes up to 78% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 54 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 10% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than Celeron G4900 - 171 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 48 vs 2 threads
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
155
90%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$49.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 313 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
FPS
171
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$11/FPS
2%
Price, CA$
CA$1881
2%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,881 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 314 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 2nd, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 48 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 250 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |