Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930T outperforms Core i7-940 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930T is 2969 days newer than Core i7-940.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Performs up to 2% better in Ready or Not than Core i7-940 - 238 vs 234 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Core i7-940 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-940 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-940
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 8 vs 2 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i7-940
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Core i7-940 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Bloomfield |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
