Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3960X outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3960X is 1877 days older than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Core i7-3960X - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3960X
- Performs up to 2% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron G3930T - 94 vs 92 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 12 vs 2 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
FPS
94
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.32/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$500
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$500 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
79.42028985507247%
Multi-Core
948
28.23108993448481%
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Core i7-3960X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 14th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |