Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX is 587 days newer than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX - 35 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
- Performs up to 10% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron G3930T - 184 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 64 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
Desktop • Aug 13th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
46.440677966101696%
Multi-Core
948
13.128375571250519%
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 13th, 2018 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Colfax |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 32 |
| 2 | Threads | 64 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 250 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
