Buy on Amazon
CA$1,393.07
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $999
Availability
MSRP in USD: $999
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 219 days newer than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 7% better in Escape From Tarkov than Celeron G3930T - 203 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 32 vs 2 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
203
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$1393.07
100%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X (16-core/32-thread) Desktop Processor (YD195XA8AEWOF)
Buy for CA$1,393.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76517 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
46.79760888129804%
Multi-Core
948
12.574612017508954%
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 16 |
| 2 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
