Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 219 days newer than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 4% better in God of War than Celeron G3930T - 171 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 24 vs 2 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
171
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$280.74
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$280.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76186 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
46.678023850085175%
Multi-Core
948
13.589449541284404%
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |