Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900 outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900 is 1470 days newer than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5900 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900
- Performs up to 24% better in Resident Evil 4 than Celeron G3930T - 194 vs 157 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 24 vs 2 threads
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Ryzen 9 5900
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
26.705653021442494%
Multi-Core
948
9.609731373542827%
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5900 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2021 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 12 |
| 2 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
