Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930T outperforms FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930T is 1345 days newer than FX-4350.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FX-4350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | AMD FX-4350 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Celeron | Collection | FX |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
