Key Differences
In short — Pentium G4400 outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G4400 is 490 days older than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Pentium G4400 - 51 vs 54 Watts
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Performs up to 1% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Celeron G3930 - 229 vs 227 FPS
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for CA$39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
87.60806916426513%
Multi-Core
1043
88.09121621621621%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Pentium G4400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |