Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7940X outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7940X is 241 days newer than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than Intel Core i9-7940X - 51 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7940X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7940X
- Performs up to 11% better in Alan Wake 2 than Celeron G3930 - 112 vs 101 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 28 vs 2 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
44.37956204379562%
Multi-Core
1043
10.51093419328832%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i9-7940X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 14 |
2 | Threads | 28 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |