Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 2200 days newer than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 51 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 42% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Celeron G3930 - 178 vs 125 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 32 vs 2 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i9-13900KS
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
19.581320450885666%
Multi-Core
1043
4.777172170567489%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 24 |
| 2 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 150 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
