Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 1019 days newer than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 51 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 33% better in Starfield than Celeron G3930 - 61 vs 46 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 20 vs 2 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$452.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75676 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
38.578680203045685%
Multi-Core
1043
11.130082168391848%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |