Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms Core i3-530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 2553 days newer than Core i3-530.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 2% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-530 - 128 vs 126 FPS
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than Intel Core i3-530 - 51 vs 73 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-530
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i3-530
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i3-530 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Clarkdale |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 73 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
