Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9600 is 1144 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i5-9600 - CA$67.56 vs CA$209.01
- Up to 67% better value when playing Mass Effect: Andromeda than Core i5-9600 - CA$0.32 vs CA$0.96 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600
- Performs up to 5% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Celeron G3900 - 217 vs 207 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 6 vs 2 threads
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
207
95.39170506912443%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$67.56
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$67.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
217
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.96/FPS
33.333333333333336%
Price, CA$
CA$209.01
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$209.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
39.74008207934337%
Multi-Core
992
20.06472491909385%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i5-9600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |