Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1458 days newer than Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Celeron G540 - 150 vs 148 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Celeron G540 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
150
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$66.34
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$66.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13255 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Celeron G540 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |