Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1420 days newer than FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 2% better in Valorant than FX-4100 - 694 vs 680 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
694
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.1/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$66.34
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$66.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 640 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |