Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 2266 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 98% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - CA$41.21 vs CA$1987.31
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 53 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 9% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Celeron G1840 - 209 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 32 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76834 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
209
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$1987.31
2%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,987.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76834 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
505
30.13126491646778%
Multi-Core
854
6.913300412855176%
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 280 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |