Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1840 outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G1840 is 932 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Performs up to 1% better in World of Tanks than FX-4100 - 506 vs 503 FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 53 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 23% cheaper than Celeron G1840 - CA$31.73 vs CA$41.21
- Up to 25% better value when playing World of Tanks than Celeron G1840 - CA$0.06 vs CA$0.08 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 4 vs 2 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
506
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.08/FPS
75%
Price, CA$
CA$41.21
76%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
503
99.40711462450594%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.06/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$31.73
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$31.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |