Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1820 outperforms Core i7-965 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1820 is 1840 days newer than Core i7-965.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Performs up to 2% better in Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Core i7-965 - 50 vs 49 FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i7-965 - 53 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-965 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-965
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 8 vs 2 threads
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Core i7-965
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i7-965 |
|---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 Extreme |
| Haswell | Codename | Bloomfield |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 130 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
