Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1820 outperforms Core i5-750 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1820 is 1545 days newer than Core i5-750.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Performs up to 2% better in Rust than Core i5-750 - 156 vs 153 FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Core i5-750 - 53 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-750 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-750
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Core i5-750
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i5-750 |
|---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Lynnfield |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
