Key Differences
In short — Core i5-2500S outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-2500S is 1057 days older than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i5-2500S - 53 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500S
- Performs up to 1% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron G1820 - 168 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Core i5-2500S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
83.78839590443687%
Multi-Core
825
55.29490616621984%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i5-2500S |
|---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
