Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 1584 days newer than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 53 vs 54 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 5% better in Starfield than Celeron G1820 - 46 vs 44 FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
46
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.09/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$49.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6551 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
53 W | TDP | 54 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |