Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1820 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1820 is 363 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Performs up to 1% better in Sea of Thieves than Celeron G1610 - 205 vs 203 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 53 vs 55 Watts
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
53 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |