Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 2185 days newer than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 53 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 13% better in Escape From Tarkov than Celeron G1820 - 213 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 48 vs 2 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
213
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$1156.84
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,156.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76890 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
29.454109178164366%
Multi-Core
825
6.195088984005406%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 48 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 280 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |